|
|
Clergy Sabbaticals This paper is presented to the dioceses after reflection within the Commission and consultation with Diocesan Directors or Representatives at meetings over the past year. It is offered to dioceses as a aid to decide on the need for a written policy on Clergy Sabbaticals to determine what matters would be in such a policy. [1] MEANING OF SABBATICALS Among
the ancient Jews every seventh year was a Sabbatical Year when the fields were
left untilled and debtors were
released. In the Macquarie Dictionary Sabbatical Leave is explained as a year,
term or other period of freedom from teaching granted to a teacher, as for
travel or study. Sabbatical leave also applies to professions other than
teaching. Sabbaticals
are common in the academic world and in various professions. They have been
common for some time among religious priests, but not among diocesan clergy,
except for a few in specialised jobs, academic or other. Several dioceses are
presently discussing or have recently formulated a written policy on Sabbaticals
for clergy. About a third of the dioceses in Australia have no policies or structures for enabling their clergy to take sabbatical leave. Where there are policies, the understanding of sabbatical leave varies. Some dioceses do not use the word sabbatical or use sabbatical as well as study leave, recreational leave, renewal leave, long-service leave, etc. For
our purposes, Sabbatical Leave means a period of time usually 12 months, 6
months or 3 months, away from one’s normal work and given over to continuing
education, either personal or professional improvement, or both. It can be spent
either overseas or in one’s own country. It is different from long service
leave or study leave. [2] PASTORES DABO VOBIS When
Pastores Dabo Vobis, the post-synodal
Apostolic Exhortation to the church of Pope John Paul II in 1992, briefly lists
forms of continuing education or formation for clergy, it makes no explicit
mention of Sabbaticals. Its brief list of “privileged” moments for ongoing
formation seems to be directed to activities occurring in a diocese each year
(80). What is said there, however, and what it says elsewhere about the nature,
purpose and various areas of ongoing formation for clergy, supports the view
that regular Sabbaticals at intervals throughout the life of a bishop, priest or deacon
are a very
concentrated and most effective form of these “privileged” times for ongoing
formation. The 1993 Directory explicitly mentions Sabbatical Periods and the
development around the world in recent years of carefully planned and integrated
Sabbatical programs for clergy confirms this view. Ongoing formation is not a repetition of the formation acquired in the seminary, simply reviewed or expanded with new and practical suggestions. Ongoing formation involves relatively new content and especially methods. (71) Its
aim is to promote a general and
integral process of constant growth, deepening each of the aspects of formation
- human, spiritual, intellectual and pastoral - as well as ensuring their active
and harmonious integration, based on pastoral charity and in reference to it.
(71) (1) Fuller development is first required in the human aspect of priestly
formation. Through his daily contact with people,
his sharing in their daily lives, the priest needs to develop and sharpen his
human sensitivity so as to understand more clearly their needs, respond to their
demands, perceive their unvoiced questions and share the hopes and expectations,
the joys and burdens which are part of life: Thus he will be able to meet and
enter into dialogue with all people. (72) (2) The formation of the priest in its spiritual dimension is required
by the new Gospel life to which he has been called in a specific way by the Holy
spirit, poured out in the sacrament of holy orders. The priest’s prayer life in particular
needs to be continually “reformed.” Experience teaches that in prayer one
cannot live off past gains. (72) (3) The intellectual dimension of formation likewise needs to be
continually fostered through the priest’s entire life, especially by a
commitment to study and a serious and disciplined familiarity with modern
culture. In particular, continuing theological
study is necessary if the priest is to faithfully carry out the ministry of the
word, proclaiming it clearly and without ambiguity, distinguishing it from mere
human opinions, no matter how renowned and widespread these might be. (72) (4) The pastoral aspect of ongoing formation is well expressed by the
words of the apostle Peter: “As each has received a gift, employ it for one
another, as good stewards of God’s varied grace” (1 Peter 4:10). Indeed, pastoral charity not only
coordinates and unifies the diverse aspects, but it makes them more specific,
marking them out as aspects of the formation of the priest as such, that is, of
the priest as a clear and living image, a minister of Jesus the good shepherd.
(72) The
need for clergy to set aside time for their ongoing education is enshrined in
other important church and papal documents: Vatican II’s Decree on Priestly Formation, #22, and its Decree on Ministry and Life of Priests, #19, Code of Canon Law (1983), #279, and Directory on the Ministry and Life of Priests (1993), # 83. [3] PRESENT DIOCESAN POLICIES
At
present we have in our office files written documents under various titles that
were sent from 3 Archdioceses and 11 dioceses concerning Sabbaticals for Clergy, where Sabbaticals are offered to all
clergy,
explicitly or implicitly. Some of these
documents are specifically diocesan policies on Sabbaticals, others treat
Sabbaticals in a broader context of other matters. Nine
other dioceses stated they had no policy on Sabbaticals. Some dioceses do have
customary practices that allow for Sabbaticals to clergy who request them. The
length of Sabbaticals and their frequency vary from diocese to diocese as do
policies in financing. [4] FORMULATING A DIOCESAN
POLICY The
“how” of Sabbatical Leave is the responsibility of the bishop in each
diocese. Issues that a policy needs to decide include the following: Background1.
Definition: the parameters of Sabbatical Leave, clarifying what is
meant by integral continuing formation or education. 2.
Basis in relevant church documents, especially Pastores
Dabo Vobis. Practicalities3. Duration: 12 months, 6 months, 3 months? 4. Frequency: every 12 years, 6 years, 3 years? 5. Number on Sabbatical each year from the diocese? 6.
Eligibility: how many years after ordination? 7.
Financial arrangements: a diocesan responsibility? redirecting funds? 8.
Supply arrangements during priest’s absence: who staffs the parish? Pre-Planning9.
Method of application: when,
to whom? 10.
Procedure for deciding on type of Sabbatical: who shares
responsibility? 11
Criteria: desires of the bishop, priest or deacon who is considering
Sabbatical Leave, his personal gifts, future needs of
the diocese
On-Return12. Debriefing after Sabbatical: with whom? 13.
Evaluation of the Sabbatical: with whom? what process? 14.
Pastoral Planning by bishop, priest or deacon: with whom and what process? [5] CONCLUSIONS The
Commission sees Sabbaticals as an important element in the continuing education
of clergy and supports written diocesan policies towards making them a regular
feature in the life and ministry of each diocesan bishop, priest or deacon. In line with Vatican
II and Pastores Dabo Vobis #76-77, the
Commission for Clergy Life and Ministry considers ongoing education not as
an optional extra but as an integral part of the entire ministry and life of a bishop, priest or deacon. The
Commission sees Sabbatical Leave, where a prolonged period of time is given over
to one’s continuing education in any or all its aspects - the human,
spiritual, intellectual and pastoral, to be a vital and very effective way of
continuing education. Some
might see the present shortage of priests as a reason against such a policy. The
Commission, on the contrary, believes that as the shortage of priests bites
harder, the flexibility and the quality of their service will need to be
enriched, and that regular Sabbaticals are a most effective way of doing this. John Reilly sj. Executive Officer, 8 February 1998.
|